Clancy case holdout juror speaks publicly, defends stance
Michael Desronvil, the sole juror who wanted to convict Lindsay Clancy, has spoken publicly for the first time since the mistrial.
Michael Desronvil, the one juror who insisted on convicting Lindsay Clancy of strangling her three children, spoke publicly for the first time since the mistrial was declared in September. He said he has been harassed since his identity became public, with media outlets surrounding his home.
The other 11 jurors were ready to acquit Clancy based on postpartum psychosis, but Desronvil believed the evidence showed premeditation and method. He described Clancy's actions as methodical, which he said was decisive in his thinking.
Other jurors claimed Desronvil was unwilling to compromise and hostile during deliberations. Clancy used exercise bands to strangle her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months old, in January 2023, before jumping from a second-story window.
The mistrial means retrial is likely.
- Michael P. Desronvil
- Holdout juror
- 11
- Jurors for acquittal
- 3 (Cora 5, Dawson 3, Callan 8 months)
- Children killed
- January 2023
- Killing date
Why it mattersThe split reveals how postpartum psychosis as a legal defence deeply divides jurors, with one person's certainty overriding 11 others' conviction on insanity grounds.
AustraliaNo direct Australian effect, though the case is being followed closely by Australian media and audiences interested in high-profile US criminal trials.
Open this story in InSnip →
